Posts Tagged ‘ Ron Paul ’

Dorothy Rabinowitz’s attack on Ron Paul, part 3

December 29, 2011
posted by

Jacob G Hornberger Future of Freedom Foundation
by Jacob G. Hornberger  

"One of the most disappointing aspects of Wall Street Journal editorial member Dorothy Rabinowitz’s attack on Ron Paul for his foreign-policy views pertains to the motives of those who are driven to commit terrorist attacks on the United States. While repeatedly pooh-poohing Paul’s emphasis on U.S. foreign policy for being the motive behind the 9/11 attacks, Rabinowitz failed to reveal her own thinking on the subject. That’s truly a shame because she passed up an opportunity to give people a glimpse into the interventionist mind on this important subject." (12/29/11)

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2011-12-29.asp  

No Comments »

Ron Paul is a disaster for Republicans and Democrats, but not for America’s freedoms

December 29, 2011
posted by

Backwoods Home
by Dave Duffy  

"Enough of us are still left who want freedom above everything else, even security, that we ignited 'spontaneously' as a political movement. That’s why Ron Paul has caught on with both conservatives and liberals who value America’s freedoms above all else. And that’s why both old guard Republicans like Dick Morris and Newt Gingrich and old guard Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama are scared stiff of us." (12/29/11)

http://bit.ly/rzkwoU  

No Comments »

The anti-Ron Paul Axis of “Decency”

December 29, 2011
posted by

Pro Libertate
by Will Grigg  

"Newt Gingrich, lapsed adulterer, impenitent warmonger, and self-appointed 'teacher of civilization,' has excommunicated Ron Paul and his supporters from the ranks of human decency. A similar anathema has been pronounced by left-wing heresy hunter David Neiwert -- a former sidekick to the degenerate fraud named Morris Dees -- and many other self-appointed political 'watchdogs.' Those banishment decrees condemn Dr. Paul and his supporters for rejecting the fundamental tenet of statism -- the belief that officially sanctioned lethal coercion is the key to social progress." (12/29/11)

http://bit.ly/u0fRSc  

No Comments »

More lies from Ron Paul

December 29, 2011
posted by

Freedom's Phoenix Freedom's Phoenix
by Mike Renzulli  

"I was active in the libertarian movement and Party for over twelve years. During my time spent among them I noticed that, in a general sense, libertarians have no problem questioning or taking to task society's inconsistencies. But when one of their own or an outsider questions or disagrees with them many times libertarians tend to refuse to believe they are wrong. Sometimes they even go so far as to angrily demonize the dissenter for pointing out their hypocrisy." (12/28/11)

http://bit.ly/uZ2pt3  

3 Comments »

Ron Paul and Israel

December 29, 2011
posted by

The American Conservative The American Conservative
by Leon Hadar  

"There is nothing 'anti-Israeli' in Paul’s resistance to providing aid to Israel. He has been a long-time opponent of providing American economic aid to all foreign countries, which, he believes, amounts to wasting U.S. tax-payer money on sustaining policies that do not necessarily align with American interests and values.Instead, he would encourage the promotion of trade and investment ties with Israel and other countries." (12/29/11)

http://bit.ly/rtggO2  

No Comments »

Would Ron Paul have stopped the Holocaust?

December 28, 2011
posted by

The American Conservative The American Conservative
by Daniel McCarthy  

"The latest line of attack on the Texas congressman, courtesy of his ex-staffer Eric Dondero, has it that Ron Paul would not have taken us into World War II to stop the Holocaust. 'He expressed to me countless times, that ‘saving the Jews,’ was absolutely none of our business,' Dondero claims. Of course, that’s exactly how Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Harry Truman, and the rest of America’s wartime leaders felt." (12/28/11)

http://bit.ly/s8YivK  

No Comments »

An anarchist on Ron Paul

December 27, 2011
posted by

Nolan Chart Nolan Chart
by Van Bryant II  

"Were it a viable choice, my vote in 2012 would be cast for 'none of the above.' Presently, that will not be a listed option on the ballot, neither is there a cohesive write-in movement for such. Not voting has even less of an impact: there will be a President, and there will be butts sitting in the Capitol Building, whether 99 or 1% of the electorate casts their vote. Until this changes (and believe me, it needs to), I support Ron Paul and the libertarian movement." (12/27/11)

http://www.nolanchart.com/article9198-an-anarchist-on-ron-paul.html  

No Comments »

Dorothy Rabinowitz’s attack on Ron Paul, part 1

December 27, 2011
posted by

Jacob G Hornberger Future of Freedom Foundation
by Jacob G. Hornberger  

"One of the more fascinating attacks on Ron Paul comes from Dorothy Rabinowitz in the December 22, 2012, issue of the Wall Street Journal. Not surprisingly, given that Rabinowitz serves on the Journal’s editorial board, she goes after Paul for his foreign-policy views. What I found interesting about the article, which is entitled 'What Ron Paul Thinks of America,' is the superficial nature of the attack. Rabinowitz’s article, quite simply, lacks any depth of analysis on the critical points she makes about Paul." (12/27/11)

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2011-12-27.asp  

No Comments »

Ron Paul: Propagandist or prophet?

December 26, 2011
posted by

LewRockwell.com
by Jeremy R. Hammond  

"Notice that Rabinowitz doesn’t actually deny that the 9/11 attacks were motivated by such U.S. policies as these. Rather, Ron Paul’s sin is that he actually acknowledges this truth. The fact that other political figures choose to ignore or deny this fact hardly reflects poorly on Dr. Paul. Refusing to bury one’s head deeply up one’s arse, as Rabinowitz is so obviously willing to do, is hardly a character trait to be faulted." (12/26/11)

http://lewrockwell.com/orig12/hammond2.1.1.html  

No Comments »

I do not think it means what you think it means

December 25, 2011
posted by

Thomas L. Knapp KN@PPSTER
by Thomas L. Knapp  

"Smear as a noun refers to 'a slanderous defamation;' as a verb, it means to 'charge falsely or with malicious intent; attack the good name and reputation of someone.' The Ron Paul 'newsletter controversy' is not a 'smear' in either sense of the word, and those who attempt to make it one -- and to shift responsibility for the newsletters' content from their owner and publisher to those who happened to notice it -- do their candidate a disservice." (12/25/11)

http://bit.ly/t9jdT8  

No Comments »

The right way for Ron Paul to respond to the newsletter controversy

December 25, 2011
posted by

Shikha Dalmia Reason
by Shikha Dalmia  

"[T]he options before libertarians -- whose numbers have swollen in recent times in no small part due to Paul -- is that they can circle the wagons around him and attack his attackers by: blaming his troubles on a giant media conspiracy; condemning libertarians troubled by the newsletters as rigid purists; changing the subject by comparing Paul’s current, cleansed agenda with that of his opponents; cheering him on as he walks off TV interviews and so on. Or it can demand accountability from Paul." (12/25/11)

http://bit.ly/slpQUU  

No Comments »

How did we get here? Or, why do 20 year old newsletters matter so damn much?

December 25, 2011
posted by

Bleeding Heart Libertarians
by Steve Horwitz  

"Those of us who watched all of this happen over two decades knew it would come back to haunt us and so it has, unfortunately just as Ron Paul and libertarianism are on the cusp of something really amazing. And that only goes to show what a mistake the paleo strategy was: imagine if the newsletters were not an issue and Paul were to win Iowa. Yeah, he might get ignored, but he would not be the easy media target he is now, nor would all of libertarianism pay a potential price." (12/23/11)

http://bit.ly/ubYJNs  

No Comments »

What about Ron Paul?

December 22, 2011
posted by

Gary Chartier Bleeding Heart Libertarians
by Gary Chartier  

"As an anarchist, I believe the state is unjust, unnecessary, and dangerous. So I’d certainly like to see it reduced in size rather than expanded. And Ron Paul is actually interested in making the bloated behemoth that is the United States government smaller (though he still seems mistakenly to treat it as legitimate in principle). But I think it’s vital to proceed dialectically, in full awareness of the interconnections among various forms of oppression." (12/21/11)

http://bit.ly/vr1CxH  

No Comments »

Ron Paul changes story on racial comments

December 21, 2011
posted by

USA Today    

"Rep. Ron Paul has tried since 2001 to disavow racist and incendiary language published in Texas newsletters that bore his name, denying he wrote them and even walking out of an interview on CNN Wednesday. But he vouched for the accuracy of the writings and admitted writing at least some of the passages when first asked about them in an interview in 1996." [editor's note: That excerpt isn't especially new news, except that Paul managed to wedge foot further in mouth on it with the CNN interview - TLK] (12/21/11)

http://tinyurl.com/7pob2jg  

No Comments »

Paulitics 101

December 19, 2011
posted by

Thomas L. Knapp KN@PPSTER
by Thomas L. Knapp  

"I'm actually sort of re-growing a soft spot for Ron Paul after my period of disillusionment with him. I won't vote for him, mind you; but since I won't vote at all, I won't vote against him, either. I don't see any reason to retract any of the harsh things I've said about him, because they are all true; but looking back at my meanness, I have, over time, realized that I had a tendency to drop one key piece of context ..." (12/19/11)

http://knappster.blogspot.com/2011/12/paulitics-101.html  

No Comments »

Chris Wallace discredits, discounts, disowns Ron Paul

December 19, 2011
posted by

Garry Reed Libertarian News Examiner
by Garry Reed  

"Fox News Pundit Chris Wallace told Fox news Pundit Neil Cavuto that if Ron Paul wins the Iowa caucuses it would discredit the Iowa caucuses. ... Maybe all of the discredit is being given to the wrong person. Maybe Fox News Pundit Chris Wallace has discredited Fox News Pundit Chris Wallace." (12/19/11)

http://exm.nr/t8b9ib  

No Comments »

Why Ron Paul’s surge is making them nervous

December 19, 2011
posted by

Jacob G Hornberger Future of Freedom Foundation
by Jacob G. Hornberger  

"While big government statists in both the Republican and Democrat parties remain mystified over Ron Paul’s surge in the polls in Iowa, the ones who seem most confounded by this phenomenon are the members of the mainstream media, who themselves are statist to the core. They just can’t figure out how it’s possible that increasing numbers of people are gravitating to the Paul campaign, especially when the mainstream media has either ignored Paul’s campaign or done its best to ridicule Paul’s libertarian positions." (12/19/11)

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2011-12-19.asp  

No Comments »

IA: Paul leads in new poll

December 19, 2011
posted by

Ron Paul USA Today    

"Here comes ... Ron Paul. A new survey by left-leaning Public Policy Polling (PPP) finds the Texas congressman now leading for the GOP nomination in Iowa, where voters cast the first ballots of the 2012 presidential contest on Jan. 3. ... Paul's rise comes as Newt Gingrich fades. The former House speaker has dropped nine percentage points nationally since the beginning of the month, according to the Gallup daily tracking poll." (12/19/11)

http://usat.ly/rLO7eb  

No Comments »

Ron Paul and the morality of voting

December 18, 2011
posted by

Liberale et Libertaire
by dL  

"It is Walter Block who provides us with the 'moral obligation' argument regarding Paul as a 'libertarian litmus test.' Block restates this litmus test in a recent article disqualifying Wendy McElroy from being a libertarian because of her refusal to support Paul’s candidacy. The best thing I can say about Block is that he clearly demonstrates the folly of treating libertarianism as a moral theory." (12/16/11)

http://bit.ly/upyd1o  

No Comments »

Wallace: Iowa “won’t count” if Ron Paul wins

December 15, 2011
posted by

The Raw Story    

"Fox News host Chris Wallace doesn’t want Republicans to go wasting their votes on Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul’s campaign. Wallace, who is moderating a Thursday’s Republican presidential debate, told Fox News’s Neil Cavuto on Wednesday that a Paul win would 'discredit' the Iowa caucuses." [editor's note: Finally, someone from the MSM admits out loud how completely the game is fixed - SAT] (12/15/11)

http://tinyurl.com/6qtypst  

No Comments »

As disenchantment with idiocy surges, Ron Paul support soars

December 14, 2011
posted by

Zero Hedge
by "Tyler Durden"  

"Every legacy media and central planner's worst nightmare is slowly coming true: as the broader field of GOP candidates is rapidly dropping like US secret drones blowing up nuclear power plants in Iran, due to general idiocy, incompetence, too much baggage-ness or general reverse American Idol syndrome where Americans get tired with any given 'leader' only to vote them out of the primary the following week, the one clear winner is becoming Ron Paul." (12/13/11)

http://bit.ly/tSZxtf  

No Comments »

Five myths about Ron Paul

December 13, 2011
posted by

Ron Paul Washington Post
by Nick Gillespie  

"Ron Paul is the Rodney Dangerfield of Republican presidential candidates. The 12-term Texas congressman ran for president on the Libertarian Party ticket back in 1988 and was widely seen as a sideshow in 2008, despite finishing third in the GOP field behind John McCain and Mike Huckabee. Why, despite a small but devoted set of supporters, does this 76-year-old obstetrician turned politician routinely get no respect from the media and GOP operatives?" (12/09/11)

http://wapo.st/thXf8D  

No Comments »

A culture of denial

December 12, 2011
posted by

Freedom's Phoenix Freedom's Phoenix
by Mike Renzulli  

"The magnitude of support for Ron Paul is impressive. He is poised to do very well in Iowa and it looks like the campaign to support libertarian's favorite Texas member of Congress has more enthusiasm behind it than Paul's 2008 campaign. What is fascinating is how gullible libertarians are regarding Paul's excuses, the way he panders to them too and the double standard libertarians take toward him." (12/11/11)

http://bit.ly/rPm0fe  

No Comments »

The adultery of hope

December 8, 2011
posted by

Orange County Register
by Ron Hart  

"Some guy named Ron Paul keeps placing first or second in most polls, yet no one in the media seems to recognize him. Michele Bachmann led at one time, as did Rick Perry; last month it was Herman Cain. Yet Newt is surging now, which is what got him in trouble with his divorces. A man named 'Newton' has to understand this law of gravity: What goes up can quickly come down." (12/07/11)

http://tinyurl.com/6ob3dnw  

No Comments »

Does Donald Trump realize he just made a complete ass of himself?

December 4, 2011
posted by

LewRockwell.com
by Mark R. Crovelli  

"I have to admit that I was somewhat disappointed when the Ron Paul campaign decided to skip the Republican 'debate' being staged by Donald Trump. I was looking forward to seeing the most distinguished and honorable politician in the last fifty years making a fool out the megalomaniacal 'moderator' with the appalling toupee. It turns out, however, that Ron Paul didn’t even have to show up in order to make a fool out of Donald Trump. Trump is one of those rare individuals who can’t help making a complete ass out of himself when there is no one else around to do it for him, and this occasion was no different." (12/05/11)

http://lewrockwell.com/crovelli/crovelli65.1.html  

No Comments »

Our Sponsors



Making a living off your Drupal site?

Drupal Managed Hosting

Fed up with Maintenance and Hosting companies?