Posts Tagged ‘ anarchism ’

The return of the return of anarchism

March 29, 2011
posted by

C4SS Center for a Stateless Society
by Thomas L. Knapp  

"Like those rumors of Mark Twain’s death, recurring claims of anarchism’s demise and resurrection are greatly exaggerated. Greenwald misinterprets his own observations. It is not resurrection he sees, it’s resurgence: A cyclical phenomenon driven primarily by the reliably recurring failure of the modern state to deliver on its most basic promises of peace, prosperity and respect for human rights." (03/28/11)

http://c4ss.org/content/6582  

No Comments »

Can a Christian be an anarchist?

March 29, 2011
posted by

Free Advice
by Robert P. Murphy  

"First and foremost, I am a Christian. I have accepted Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Savior. Now, does someone rule over me? Yes, His name is Jesus Christ. That’s what I just said. So, does that mean I’m a free man or not? Well, that’s a complicated question." (03/27/11)

http://tinyurl.com/4mhd4r5  

No Comments »

It’s a voluntary reaction

March 24, 2011
posted by

Debbie Harbeson Jeffersonville Evening News
by  

"I realized during our e-mail conversation that [Floyd County Republican Party chairman Dave Matthews] is also confused because he thinks my ultimate goal is smaller government (whatever that means). It’s not. My goal is a society completely absent of the aggressive institution we call government. My goal is a society of voluntary interactions. Yes, that means I advocate a form of anarchism." (03/24/11)

http://tinyurl.com/4qogk3v  

No Comments »

Revolution not replication

March 24, 2011
posted by

C4SS Center for a Stateless Society
by David D'Amato  

"The readiness of Yemenis, both within the country’s conscripted military and without, to regard as aligned the interests of productive, working class people and those of military or government elites could prove perilous. Indeed, Egypt’s military seems likely to shepherd the people into a new framework of draconian rule to match the one that just ended — or perhaps the old one continued with new personnel. A market anarchist revolution, evolving through commercial interchange and voluntary synergy rather than violence, would not subject society to a new ruling class. It would desert forever the idea that there need be or ought to be a ruling class at all." (03/23/11)

http://c4ss.org/content/6509  

No Comments »

More on minarchism as evil

March 3, 2011
posted by

Strike The Root Strike the Root
by Per Bylund  

"Those who truly believe in a society with no masters and no slaves cannot provide a blueprint for how that society will work. If people are truly free to collaborate with whoever they wish and do so on whatever terms they voluntarily agree, then any blueprint for society is a completely worthless and possibly treacherous mind game. It but creates an illusion of anarchism being able to provide guarantees that are always impossible -- government or no government." (03/03/11)

http://strike-the-root.com/more-on-minarchism-as-evil  

No Comments »

Socialism: The Qaddafi version

February 28, 2011
posted by

C4SS Center for a Stateless Society
by David D'Amato  

"[T]he Qaddafi permutation of socialism has been, by all accounts, more practical than philosophical, a variable and temperamental medley of views informed more by his personal idiosyncrasies than by ideological inclination. Impassioned disagreement would have been — if there could be one at all — among the invariable marks of socialistic thought, and the pages of Benjamin Tucker’s Liberty were at all times brimming with the fever of debate over everything from banking, to interest, to land." (02/24/11)

http://c4ss.org/content/6267  

No Comments »

Underground couriers needed

February 28, 2011
posted by

Daily Anarchist Daily Anarchist
by Seth King  

"There are many enterprises desperately needed in order to smoothen the transition to a stateless society. Among the most important of them are agorist banking, insurance, arbitration, and defense. Yet, there are countless others that are often ignored." (02/28/11)

http://dailyanarchist.com/2011/02/28/underground-couriers-needed/  

No Comments »

The system needs us, we don’t need the system

February 21, 2011
posted by

C4SS Center for a Stateless Society
by Darian Worden  

"The power-hungry will always claim they will exploit less than the other guy, and make the unstated assumption that exploitation is a necessity. But exploitation and rulership are not needed to maintain a peaceful and prosperous society of freedom." (02/20/11)

http://c4ss.org/content/6226  

No Comments »

The agorist revolutionary alternative

February 20, 2011
posted by

J. Neil Schulman J. Neil Schulman @ Rational Review
by J. Neil Schulman  

"Back in the early 1970’s Samuel Edward Konkin III, a libertarian activist, editor, and writer — began looking for alternatives to traditional political activism, both electoral and revolutionary — to bring about a free society. Sam’s premise was that electoral participation was a game that paid off not in liberty but in power; and that because the state’s tentacles held society hostage traditional revolutionary tactics resulted in unacceptable collateral damage to innocent bystanders." (02/16/11)

http://tinyurl.com/46mhohu  

No Comments »

A message to reformists

February 20, 2011
posted by

DFW Alliance of the Libertarian Left
by Julia Riber Pitt  

"The ideas of the reformists -- that strengthening the central government will somehow make it easier to abolish the institution in later times -- is a laughable one that has no basis in history or reality. They, however, continue to propagate this without giving much thought as to how it will eventually 'set the conditions' (a phrase reformists love to repeat) for a future stateless, classless society. We need to be doing what anarchists were originally doing: putting faith in the people around us instead of the people above us." (02/18/11)

http://dallas.libertarianleft.org/blog/2011/a-message-to-reformists  

No Comments »

Romans 13: Ordained by sin, ordered by love

February 20, 2011
posted by

Libertarian Alliance Libertarian Alliance
by Ricardo Rodriguez and Brennan Lester  

"There it began -- the Roman Emperor Theodosius I signed the decree, and all of Rome was coerced into Christianity. Ever since then, as economist Ludwig von Mises notes very well, Christianity has never been able to put down the sword on a large scale. For politics eats away at a man -- the politicization of something profoundly changes a man and his ideologies." (02/18/11)

http://tinyurl.com/4j73hv7  

No Comments »

“Pro-government anarchists”

February 20, 2011
posted by

WendyMcElroy.com
by Carl Watner  

"If history teaches us anything, it is that war, like no other activity of the State, decimates anarchist movements. Not only does war create a breach in libertarian ranks (between those who endorse governmental involvement in war and those who don't), the State inevitably uses the patriotic fervor stimulated by war to crack down on dissent during times of military conflict. The purpose of this essay is to demonstrate the fundamental anti-war position of anarchism and to shew how the war issue divided and depleted anarchist ranks during World War I." (02/17/11)

http://www.wendymcelroy.com/news.php?extend.3782  

No Comments »

In Egypt, as everywhere, anarchy is order

February 17, 2011
posted by

C4SS Center for Stateless Society
by Kevin Carson  

"The people of Egypt have managed to throw out one tyrant. Now they find themselves under a military dictatorship which may or may not wind up reducing the level of tyranny. But if the Egyptian people find the new boss as oppressive as the old one, says Molinari Institute President Roderick Long, they know how to get rid of him. If there is any real hope for the future, in the long run, it is in the anarchy that the people have built for themselves on the streets." (02/15/11)

http://c4ss.org/content/6147  

No Comments »

A quick response to Per Bylund

February 17, 2011
posted by

Strike the Root
by John deLaubenfels  

"Per Bylund's most recent column on STR is titled Why Minarchists Are the Enemy. That's a pretty strong statement, especially as it identifies minarchists not as AN enemy, but THE enemy, and the text of his column reinforces rather than softens the message." (02/17/11)

http://www.strike-the-root.com/quick-response-to-per-bylund  

No Comments »

A letter to Grover Cleveland

February 17, 2011
posted by

DFW Alliance of the Libertarian Left
by Lysander Spooner  

"My proposition, then, is, that there is not a single natural, human right, that the government of the United States recognizes as inviolable; that there is not a single natural, human right, that it hesitates to trample under foot, whenever it thinks it can promote its own interests by doing so. The proofs of this proposition are so numerous, that only a few of the most important can here be enumerated." (written 1886; posted 02/15/11)

http://tinyurl.com/4prk9r8  

No Comments »

Why minarchists are the enemy

February 16, 2011
posted by

Strike The Root Strike the Root
by Per Bylund  

"But there is a problem with joining forces with minarchists; there is a fundamental difference that makes a minarchist-anarchist union utterly impossible. This difference is the principle of force and power -- the principle of government. It is our very core belief as anarchists that force and power is wrong; that any involuntary subjection is always comparable to the end of the world. We have a true passion for justice, while minarchists do not." (02/16/11)

http://www.strike-the-root.com/why-minarchists-are-enemy  

No Comments »

All of statism is imperialism

February 15, 2011
posted by

C4SS Center for a Stateless Society
by David D'Amato  

"Anarchism doesn’t contemplate a Utopia, society without crime or unjustified force, but it does urge that we do away with the grant of authority that we now give the state to carry out criminal acts in the name of 'the People.' As dissatisfied Algerians and Yemenis are violently disbanded, sent back to their homes to endure the villainy of their countries’ elites, anarchism offers the promise of justice." (02/14/11)

http://c4ss.org/content/6131  

No Comments »

The end of the minarchist/anarchist dispute

February 15, 2011
posted by

The Libertarian Enterprise
by Paul Bonneau  

"The feud between minarchists and anarchists has come to an end. Most of them just don't realize it yet." (02/13/11)

http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2011/tle607-20110213-05.html  

No Comments »

The state is a paper tiger

February 15, 2011
posted by

Daily Anarchist Daily Anarchist
by Seth King  

"If the Egyptian protests can teach us anything it is that even the most tyrannical governments rely heavily on a veneer of overwhelming popular consent. When just a small minority of individuals withdraw their financial and moral support, the jig is up. This is because the state neither has the legitimacy, nor the resources, to capture and cage large swaths of the general public. Instead, it relies upon two major tactics to maintain hegemony: instill fear and attack weakness." (02/14/11)

http://dailyanarchist.com/2011/02/14/the-state-is-a-paper-tiger/  

No Comments »

Build counter-power, create an authority vacuum

February 14, 2011
posted by

C4SS Center for Stateless Society
by Darian Worden  

"The prospect of state collapse brings forth worries about a 'power vacuum,' an unrestrained state of nature where chaos rules until the strong take over. But chaotic conflict is produced by efforts to seize power and exert power over other people. It is not the rejection of rulership, but the struggle to achieve rulership, that creates deadly conflict." (02/10/11)

http://c4ss.org/content/6111  

No Comments »

For the state blowback is a feature, not a bug

February 13, 2011
posted by

C4SS Center for Stateless Society
by Kevin Carson  

"Governments are like organized crime families, operating as 'executive committees' of their domestic ruling classes, enforcing the privileges and artificial property rights by which their members extract rents from the domestic population. These crime families deal with each other, establishing constantly shifting alliances of convenience and redividing the world between themselves, as their relative strengths shift." (02/10/11)

http://c4ss.org/content/6098  

No Comments »

Build counter-power, create an authority vacuum

February 13, 2011
posted by

Libertarian Alliance Libertarian Alliance
by Darian Worden  

"In politics, the word power generally signifies the ability of an individual or group of individuals to influence the decisions of others. Authority is an attempt to legitimate the exercise of power to compel obedience or allegiance to the higher ranks. Anarchists reject authority in favor of individual autonomy. Anarchy means that individuals have ultimate decision-making power over their own lives, and the only social arrangements recognized as legitimate are those that are based on consensual cooperation." (02/12/11)

http://tinyurl.com/4eycxqv  

No Comments »

Kropotkin’s free-market economics

February 13, 2011
posted by

DFW Alliance of the Libertarian Left
by Justin Lee  

"As a proponent supporter of anarcho-communism, Peter Kropotkin might be dismissed by some left-libertarians as an opponent to the free market. For sure, he was a firm opponent to the private ownership of property, wage labor and rents. Nevertheless, free-market libertarians will find a lot of agreement with Kropotkin’s economic insights ..." (02/11/11)

http://tinyurl.com/4nznlt2  

No Comments »

Glenn Beck and the Coming Insurrection: Anarchism and Anonymous

February 9, 2011
posted by

Poli-Tea
by d.eris  

"The Coming Insurrection is an insurrectionary anarchist, or anarcho-communist manifesto first published in France in 2007. When Beck began talking about the work in 2009 he helped turn it into a best-seller upon its publication in English, specifically urging his audience to 'read this book' which he considered one of the 'most evil things' he'd ever read. At the time, an anarchist press collective responded to Beck with an open letter declaring: 'we're like you, except we support real freedom, and that's why you're afraid of us.'" (02/08/11)

http://tinyurl.com/46fnt7k  

No Comments »

The territorial assumption: Rationale for conquest

January 9, 2011
posted by

WendyMcElroy.com
by Wendy McElroy  

"The classic definition of the State involves two elements: a coercive monopolization of defense services over a given geographic area, and the imposition of coercive revenue collection from all of the area's inhabitants. As Murray Rothbard has pointed out, even if taxes were voluntary, the voluntaryist must still oppose state control over protective services. By what right does the State prohibit competition in the production of security?" (01/05/11)

http://www.wendymcelroy.com/news.php?extend.3717  

No Comments »

Our Sponsors





Making a living off your Drupal site?

Drupal Managed Hosting

Fed up with Maintenance and Hosting companies?