Should Ron Paul be president?

posted by
July 4, 2011
The Price of Liberty
by Paul Bonneau  
Posted in Commentary

"Don’t get me wrong. I think Ron Paul would make an excellent President, perhaps the best one ever. He of course has some faults -- which have been put on display in the internecine squabbling -- but that is not much of a concern, because every human has faults. If we must have a President at all, he’s about the best who one reasonably could hope for. 'He’s not libertarian enough,' is not an argument that impresses me very much. Despite this point, there is a much larger problem: it’s not 1921 this time around!" (07/04/11)  

Tags: , ,

  • George Washington

    Yes Sir, Mr. Ron Paul should be President of the United States of America in 2012.

    Ron Paul 2012

    Constitutionally, legislatively, and morally, Ron Paul has no equal. His 22 year voting record speaks for itself.
    Mr. Paul has not survived in politics for 22 years and maintain the ethics and morality he has by being anything other than stellar.
    If You refute the above comment, then I please invite You to listen to him speak about key issues. It is amazing how well he comes across because he doesn’t have to remember lies like other politicians. He understands what is happening in the world and knows how to apply the basic principles of liberty to achieve the real change that America so desperately deserves.
    American to American we are all on the same team. So I present Mr. Ron Paul as my Candidate for 2011 and invite anybody to meaningfully and respectfully debate why he is not the best for American and its people in 2012.
    Ron Paul = A real change, not for special interest, but for America’s Interests!
    Thank You for Your time
    Ron Paul 2012

Our Sponsors