The Senate should refuse to confirm all of Hillary Clinton’s judicial nominees

posted by
October 27, 2016
Cato Institute
by Ilya Shapiro  
Posted in Commentary

"When Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced the #NoHearingNoVote position, he argued that, given the nation's polarization and that the next justice could swing the balance of the Supreme Court, this election-year vacancy should be filled by the people’s choice. It was a principled position, but a controversial and risky one. Yet McConnell's calculus has been borne out. ... But the McCain volley, launched while campaigning for embattled Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey, is something new: are Republicans really planning to keep that seat empty for four (even eight) years if Clinton wins? (Presumably this would be in a scenario where they keep the Senate; Democrats would surely get rid of the filibuster if it came to that.) Doesn't that expose their motivations as purely partisan regardless of their high-minded rhetoric?" (10/26/16)

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/the-senate-should-refuse-confirm-all-of-hillary-clintons-judicial-nominees  

Tags: , ,

Our Sponsors